Seven years into Fund I: charting the return multiples

Seven years into Fund I: charting the return multiples
Boris
July 30, 2019

We raised our first fund in summer 2012. It was a $15m early-stage fund that we invested in 20 portfolio companies over the course of two and a half years. We’re now seven years in and the portfolio is maturing.

I plotted the return multiples (as of June 30, 2019) for all 20 portfolio companies in the chart below. The return multiple for a company is calculated by dividing the current net asset value (unrealized and realized dollar amounts) by the invested capital in that company (often invested over several rounds).

Looking at the chart, you can see that the best performing company in Fund I has generated over 48 times our invested capital to date, while a bunch of them did not generate any pay-back for the fund (and hence have a return multiple of 0). Of the 20 original portfolio companies in this fund, nine remain active while the other 11 were sold in a M&A process.

A few observations from these results:

  1. Start-ups are incredibly tough. This is pretty obvious from the outcomes on the right side of the chart. Almost half of the portfolio companies sold for way less than what was invested and many couldn’t generate any pay-back. And as you can imagine, most of those losses happened relatively early in the life of the fund.
  2. Venture capital clearly follows a power law in which outliers drive most of the returns. This is particularly true with seed-stage investing. In our case, we think that up to four companies in our Fund I portfolio could be fund makers (companies that can at least pay back the whole fund). Combined, they will probably drive more than 75% of the fund’s returns. Thanks to these outliers, our fund is tracking incredibly well and we are confident that the fund will end up producing at least a 4x return on invested capital (and possibly much more).
  3. BUT…most of those returns are currently unrealized and the next three to four years will be about working with our entrepreneurs to turn paper returns into “real” returns. As Fred Wilson recently noted:

One of the great truths about early stage investments is that you have to be patient with them. The losses come early and the winners take longer to realize. It takes seven to ten years to get to real liquidity in a portfolio of early stage venture investments. You can’t short cut it. It just takes time. But come years seven, eight, nine, and ten the returns will start coming in.

Our numbers reflect what we already knew: startups are tough. Many fail and a few succeed. And those who succeed take a long time to develop. But there is no better job than working with our entrepreneurs every day to help them build a start-up that will become one of those outliers.

Read Next

View More
Version One

Coinbase

Today our portfolio company Coinbase went public via a direct listing.

Coinbase
Boris
April 14, 2021
Version One

How to keep founders around after an acquisition

Facebook, Google, Salesforce, Twitter…all the top players in Silicon Valley want to get their hands on the best talent around. That’s why we’ve seen example after example of “acqui-hires” in the past few years as well as some very large acquisitions where a big driver was the talent behind a start-up (e.g. Nest, Beats).

How to keep founders around after an acquisition
Boris
July 28, 2014
Version One

Classifying marketplaces in a 2×2 matrix

In a recent Invest Like The Best podcast, the guest, who goes by the pseudonym Modest Proposal, described a 2×2 matrix for segmenting marketplace types. It’s a simple, yet very effective way to think about the differences in online marketplaces, from the original product marketplaces like eBay to the emerging services marketplaces. One axis represents products or services, and the other axis represents homogenous or heterogenous.

Classifying marketplaces in a 2×2 matrix
Boris
November 1, 2020